Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program
The efficacy of leadership coaching to improve leader and organizational outcomes cannot be overstated. However, a thorough understanding of some of the inputs and process variables involved in coaching has not been empirically established to date. To address this issue in the leader development and...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Scholar Commons
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7789 https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8986&context=etd |
id |
ndltd-USF-oai-scholarcommons.usf.edu-etd-8986 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-USF-oai-scholarcommons.usf.edu-etd-89862019-11-22T10:12:29Z Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program Frick, Sarah E. The efficacy of leadership coaching to improve leader and organizational outcomes cannot be overstated. However, a thorough understanding of some of the inputs and process variables involved in coaching has not been empirically established to date. To address this issue in the leader development and coaching literature, I examined the characteristics of the coaches and the coachees and their relationships with two relational variables potentially involved in coaching relationships (i.e., leader-member exchange and trust). The importance of leadership to work outcomes and leader development is highlighted, followed by a discussion of the specific leader development technique of coaching. The discussion then moves to the relational variables of interest involved in coaching, namely leader-member exchange (LMX) and trust, drawing from research on team and leadership phenomena. Specific inputs (e.g., coach and coachee characteristics) and their impacts on the relationships of interest are discussed. This work focuses on hypotheses in three streams of research: characteristics of coaches and coachees, LMX, and trust. The findings from this research indicate that a coach's experience, specifically operationalized as the activities he or she has experience in, positively predicts LMX, and self-efficacy positively predicts LMX and trust in the coaching relationships. The theoretical and practical implications of this project are noted. 2019-02-10T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7789 https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8986&context=etd Graduate Theses and Dissertations Scholar Commons leader development Coaching coach coachees leader-member exchange Trust Psychology |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
leader development Coaching coach coachees leader-member exchange Trust Psychology |
spellingShingle |
leader development Coaching coach coachees leader-member exchange Trust Psychology Frick, Sarah E. Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program |
description |
The efficacy of leadership coaching to improve leader and organizational outcomes cannot be overstated. However, a thorough understanding of some of the inputs and process variables involved in coaching has not been empirically established to date. To address this issue in the leader development and coaching literature, I examined the characteristics of the coaches and the coachees and their relationships with two relational variables potentially involved in coaching relationships (i.e., leader-member exchange and trust). The importance of leadership to work outcomes and leader development is highlighted, followed by a discussion of the specific leader development technique of coaching. The discussion then moves to the relational variables of interest involved in coaching, namely leader-member exchange (LMX) and trust, drawing from research on team and leadership phenomena. Specific inputs (e.g., coach and coachee characteristics) and their impacts on the relationships of interest are discussed. This work focuses on hypotheses in three streams of research: characteristics of coaches and coachees, LMX, and trust. The findings from this research indicate that a coach's experience, specifically operationalized as the activities he or she has experience in, positively predicts LMX, and self-efficacy positively predicts LMX and trust in the coaching relationships. The theoretical and practical implications of this project are noted. |
author |
Frick, Sarah E. |
author_facet |
Frick, Sarah E. |
author_sort |
Frick, Sarah E. |
title |
Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program |
title_short |
Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program |
title_full |
Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program |
title_fullStr |
Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program |
title_sort |
why does coaching work? an examination of inputs and process variables in an employee coaching program |
publisher |
Scholar Commons |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7789 https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8986&context=etd |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fricksarahe whydoescoachingworkanexaminationofinputsandprocessvariablesinanemployeecoachingprogram |
_version_ |
1719295208922808320 |