Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program

The efficacy of leadership coaching to improve leader and organizational outcomes cannot be overstated. However, a thorough understanding of some of the inputs and process variables involved in coaching has not been empirically established to date. To address this issue in the leader development and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frick, Sarah E.
Format: Others
Published: Scholar Commons 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7789
https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8986&context=etd
id ndltd-USF-oai-scholarcommons.usf.edu-etd-8986
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-USF-oai-scholarcommons.usf.edu-etd-89862019-11-22T10:12:29Z Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program Frick, Sarah E. The efficacy of leadership coaching to improve leader and organizational outcomes cannot be overstated. However, a thorough understanding of some of the inputs and process variables involved in coaching has not been empirically established to date. To address this issue in the leader development and coaching literature, I examined the characteristics of the coaches and the coachees and their relationships with two relational variables potentially involved in coaching relationships (i.e., leader-member exchange and trust). The importance of leadership to work outcomes and leader development is highlighted, followed by a discussion of the specific leader development technique of coaching. The discussion then moves to the relational variables of interest involved in coaching, namely leader-member exchange (LMX) and trust, drawing from research on team and leadership phenomena. Specific inputs (e.g., coach and coachee characteristics) and their impacts on the relationships of interest are discussed. This work focuses on hypotheses in three streams of research: characteristics of coaches and coachees, LMX, and trust. The findings from this research indicate that a coach's experience, specifically operationalized as the activities he or she has experience in, positively predicts LMX, and self-efficacy positively predicts LMX and trust in the coaching relationships. The theoretical and practical implications of this project are noted. 2019-02-10T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7789 https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8986&context=etd Graduate Theses and Dissertations Scholar Commons leader development Coaching coach coachees leader-member exchange Trust Psychology
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic leader development
Coaching
coach
coachees
leader-member exchange
Trust
Psychology
spellingShingle leader development
Coaching
coach
coachees
leader-member exchange
Trust
Psychology
Frick, Sarah E.
Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program
description The efficacy of leadership coaching to improve leader and organizational outcomes cannot be overstated. However, a thorough understanding of some of the inputs and process variables involved in coaching has not been empirically established to date. To address this issue in the leader development and coaching literature, I examined the characteristics of the coaches and the coachees and their relationships with two relational variables potentially involved in coaching relationships (i.e., leader-member exchange and trust). The importance of leadership to work outcomes and leader development is highlighted, followed by a discussion of the specific leader development technique of coaching. The discussion then moves to the relational variables of interest involved in coaching, namely leader-member exchange (LMX) and trust, drawing from research on team and leadership phenomena. Specific inputs (e.g., coach and coachee characteristics) and their impacts on the relationships of interest are discussed. This work focuses on hypotheses in three streams of research: characteristics of coaches and coachees, LMX, and trust. The findings from this research indicate that a coach's experience, specifically operationalized as the activities he or she has experience in, positively predicts LMX, and self-efficacy positively predicts LMX and trust in the coaching relationships. The theoretical and practical implications of this project are noted.
author Frick, Sarah E.
author_facet Frick, Sarah E.
author_sort Frick, Sarah E.
title Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program
title_short Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program
title_full Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program
title_fullStr Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program
title_full_unstemmed Why Does Coaching Work? An Examination of Inputs and Process Variables in an Employee Coaching Program
title_sort why does coaching work? an examination of inputs and process variables in an employee coaching program
publisher Scholar Commons
publishDate 2019
url https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7789
https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8986&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT fricksarahe whydoescoachingworkanexaminationofinputsandprocessvariablesinanemployeecoachingprogram
_version_ 1719295208922808320