Conceptual scoring of expressive vocabulary measures in bilingual children with and without specific language impairment

Purpose: This study examined the effects of conceptual scoring on vocabulary performance of bilingual children with and without language impairment and the classification accuracy of an expressive vocabulary test across four scoring methods, single language and conceptual scoring, for bilingual (Eng...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anaya, Jissel Belinda
Format: Others
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2152/23584
id ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-23584
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-235842015-09-20T17:21:47ZConceptual scoring of expressive vocabulary measures in bilingual children with and without specific language impairmentAnaya, Jissel BelindaBilingual childrenCode switchingConceptual scoringEOWPVTVocabularyPurpose: This study examined the effects of conceptual scoring on vocabulary performance of bilingual children with and without language impairment and the classification accuracy of an expressive vocabulary test across four scoring methods, single language and conceptual scoring, for bilingual (English-Spanish) children with and without language impairment. Method: Participants included English speaking monolingual children (n=14) and Spanish-English bilingual children (n=116) ages 5-11. Children completed the English and bilingual versions of the Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test. Four different scores were derived representing monolingual scores in English and Spanish, and three conceptual scores. Within-test conceptual scores credited children’s other language responses during the test; and across-test conceptual scores compiled a conceptual score across Spanish and English administrations of the test. Results: Across-test conceptual scoring resulted in better overall classification, sensitivity, and specificity than within-test conceptual scoring, which resulted in better overall classification, sensitivity, and specificity than monolingual scoring; however, neither method achieved minimum standards of 80% accuracy in sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: Results suggest that bilingual children are not always able to readily access their second language in confrontation naming tasks. Priming or inhibition may play a role in test performance. Cross-test conceptual scoring yielded the highest classification accuracy and is the recommended method for clinical practice.text2014-03-18T20:55:56Z2013-122013-12-16December 20132014-03-18T20:55:56ZThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/23584
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Bilingual children
Code switching
Conceptual scoring
EOWPVT
Vocabulary
spellingShingle Bilingual children
Code switching
Conceptual scoring
EOWPVT
Vocabulary
Anaya, Jissel Belinda
Conceptual scoring of expressive vocabulary measures in bilingual children with and without specific language impairment
description Purpose: This study examined the effects of conceptual scoring on vocabulary performance of bilingual children with and without language impairment and the classification accuracy of an expressive vocabulary test across four scoring methods, single language and conceptual scoring, for bilingual (English-Spanish) children with and without language impairment. Method: Participants included English speaking monolingual children (n=14) and Spanish-English bilingual children (n=116) ages 5-11. Children completed the English and bilingual versions of the Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test. Four different scores were derived representing monolingual scores in English and Spanish, and three conceptual scores. Within-test conceptual scores credited children’s other language responses during the test; and across-test conceptual scores compiled a conceptual score across Spanish and English administrations of the test. Results: Across-test conceptual scoring resulted in better overall classification, sensitivity, and specificity than within-test conceptual scoring, which resulted in better overall classification, sensitivity, and specificity than monolingual scoring; however, neither method achieved minimum standards of 80% accuracy in sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: Results suggest that bilingual children are not always able to readily access their second language in confrontation naming tasks. Priming or inhibition may play a role in test performance. Cross-test conceptual scoring yielded the highest classification accuracy and is the recommended method for clinical practice. === text
author Anaya, Jissel Belinda
author_facet Anaya, Jissel Belinda
author_sort Anaya, Jissel Belinda
title Conceptual scoring of expressive vocabulary measures in bilingual children with and without specific language impairment
title_short Conceptual scoring of expressive vocabulary measures in bilingual children with and without specific language impairment
title_full Conceptual scoring of expressive vocabulary measures in bilingual children with and without specific language impairment
title_fullStr Conceptual scoring of expressive vocabulary measures in bilingual children with and without specific language impairment
title_full_unstemmed Conceptual scoring of expressive vocabulary measures in bilingual children with and without specific language impairment
title_sort conceptual scoring of expressive vocabulary measures in bilingual children with and without specific language impairment
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/2152/23584
work_keys_str_mv AT anayajisselbelinda conceptualscoringofexpressivevocabularymeasuresinbilingualchildrenwithandwithoutspecificlanguageimpairment
_version_ 1716823654881296384