A multi-level investigation of absence climate: individuals, supervisory groups, and plants

The study of absence from work has been of interest to organizational researchers for over 50 years. Most prior studies have considered absence behavior from the perspective of the individual employee only. The potential effect of a social unit in which an employee works has been given relatively li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mckee, Gail Hagerman
Other Authors: Management
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/53579
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-53579
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-535792020-12-12T05:31:18Z A multi-level investigation of absence climate: individuals, supervisory groups, and plants Mckee, Gail Hagerman Management LD5655.V856 1988.M223 Absenteeism (Labor) The study of absence from work has been of interest to organizational researchers for over 50 years. Most prior studies have considered absence behavior from the perspective of the individual employee only. The potential effect of a social unit in which an employee works has been given relatively little attention. This study examines the relationship between absence behavior and absence climate at the level of the supervisory group and plant, as well as the level of the individual. Absence climate was defined as the psychologically meaningful shared perceptions that workers hold concerning absence procedures and practices occurring within an organization. These procedures and practices were categorized into three dimensions, i.e. Organizational Pressure to Attend, Explanations for Absence and Consequences of Absence. In order to assess employee perceptions of absence a questionnaire was administered to 1139 apparel employees, who were members of 46 different work groups embedded within 5 different plants of the same organization. Absence behavior was measured by both absence rate and absence frequency from attendance records over a 12 month period. This study found (after controlling for gender, age and tenure) that Explanations for Absence was significantly related to absence behavior at the individual level of analysis and that Consequences of Absence was significantly but not practically related to absence behavior at the level of the supervisory group. Hence, only the individual level of analysis was found to be appropriate for the study of absence climate in this study. Ph. D. 2015-06-24T13:35:15Z 2015-06-24T13:35:15Z 1988 Dissertation Text http://hdl.handle.net/10919/53579 en_US OCLC# 18631071 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ xiii, 211 leaves ; application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic LD5655.V856 1988.M223
Absenteeism (Labor)
spellingShingle LD5655.V856 1988.M223
Absenteeism (Labor)
Mckee, Gail Hagerman
A multi-level investigation of absence climate: individuals, supervisory groups, and plants
description The study of absence from work has been of interest to organizational researchers for over 50 years. Most prior studies have considered absence behavior from the perspective of the individual employee only. The potential effect of a social unit in which an employee works has been given relatively little attention. This study examines the relationship between absence behavior and absence climate at the level of the supervisory group and plant, as well as the level of the individual. Absence climate was defined as the psychologically meaningful shared perceptions that workers hold concerning absence procedures and practices occurring within an organization. These procedures and practices were categorized into three dimensions, i.e. Organizational Pressure to Attend, Explanations for Absence and Consequences of Absence. In order to assess employee perceptions of absence a questionnaire was administered to 1139 apparel employees, who were members of 46 different work groups embedded within 5 different plants of the same organization. Absence behavior was measured by both absence rate and absence frequency from attendance records over a 12 month period. This study found (after controlling for gender, age and tenure) that Explanations for Absence was significantly related to absence behavior at the individual level of analysis and that Consequences of Absence was significantly but not practically related to absence behavior at the level of the supervisory group. Hence, only the individual level of analysis was found to be appropriate for the study of absence climate in this study. === Ph. D.
author2 Management
author_facet Management
Mckee, Gail Hagerman
author Mckee, Gail Hagerman
author_sort Mckee, Gail Hagerman
title A multi-level investigation of absence climate: individuals, supervisory groups, and plants
title_short A multi-level investigation of absence climate: individuals, supervisory groups, and plants
title_full A multi-level investigation of absence climate: individuals, supervisory groups, and plants
title_fullStr A multi-level investigation of absence climate: individuals, supervisory groups, and plants
title_full_unstemmed A multi-level investigation of absence climate: individuals, supervisory groups, and plants
title_sort multi-level investigation of absence climate: individuals, supervisory groups, and plants
publisher Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/53579
work_keys_str_mv AT mckeegailhagerman amultilevelinvestigationofabsenceclimateindividualssupervisorygroupsandplants
AT mckeegailhagerman multilevelinvestigationofabsenceclimateindividualssupervisorygroupsandplants
_version_ 1719370087468630016