Epistemic Value Theory and Judgment Aggregation
The doctrinal paradox shows that aggregating individual judgments by taking a majority vote does not always yield a consistent set of collective judgments. Philip Pettit, Luc Bovens, and Wlodek Rabinowicz have recently argued for the epistemic superiority of an aggregation procedure that always yie...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
University of Edinburgh
2005
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/106275 |