VLSI REALIZATION OF AHPL DESCRIPTION AS SLA, PPLA, & ULA AND THEIR COMPARISONS (CAD).

Reducing circuit complexity to minimize design turnaround time and maximize chip area utilization is the most evident problem in dealing with VLSI layout. Three suggestions have been recommended to reduce circuit complexity. They are using regular modules as design targets, using hierarchical top-do...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CHEN, DUAN-PING.
Other Authors: Hill, Frederick J.
Language:en
Published: The University of Arizona. 1984
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187879
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-187879
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-1878792015-10-23T04:35:12Z VLSI REALIZATION OF AHPL DESCRIPTION AS SLA, PPLA, & ULA AND THEIR COMPARISONS (CAD). CHEN, DUAN-PING. Hill, Frederick J. Integrated circuits -- Very large scale integration. Compiling (Electronic computers) Electronic circuit design. Reducing circuit complexity to minimize design turnaround time and maximize chip area utilization is the most evident problem in dealing with VLSI layout. Three suggestions have been recommended to reduce circuit complexity. They are using regular modules as design targets, using hierarchical top-down design as a design methodology, and using CAD as a design tool. These three suggestions are the basis of this dissertation project. In this dissertation, three silicon compilers were implemented which take an universal AHPL circuit description as an input and automatically translate it into SLA (Storage Logic Array), PPLA (Path Programmable Logic Array), and ULA (Uncommitted Logic Array) chip layout. The goal is to study different layout algorithms and to derive better algorithms for alternative VLSI structures. In order to make a precise chip area comparison of these three silicon compilers, real SLA and ULA circuits have been designed. Four typical AHPL descriptions of different circuits or varying complexity were chosen as comparison examples. The result shows that the SLA layout requires least area for circuit realization generally. The PPLA approach is the worst one for large scale circuit realization, while the ULA lies in between. 1984 text Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187879 693588086 8505228 en Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. The University of Arizona.
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Integrated circuits -- Very large scale integration.
Compiling (Electronic computers)
Electronic circuit design.
spellingShingle Integrated circuits -- Very large scale integration.
Compiling (Electronic computers)
Electronic circuit design.
CHEN, DUAN-PING.
VLSI REALIZATION OF AHPL DESCRIPTION AS SLA, PPLA, & ULA AND THEIR COMPARISONS (CAD).
description Reducing circuit complexity to minimize design turnaround time and maximize chip area utilization is the most evident problem in dealing with VLSI layout. Three suggestions have been recommended to reduce circuit complexity. They are using regular modules as design targets, using hierarchical top-down design as a design methodology, and using CAD as a design tool. These three suggestions are the basis of this dissertation project. In this dissertation, three silicon compilers were implemented which take an universal AHPL circuit description as an input and automatically translate it into SLA (Storage Logic Array), PPLA (Path Programmable Logic Array), and ULA (Uncommitted Logic Array) chip layout. The goal is to study different layout algorithms and to derive better algorithms for alternative VLSI structures. In order to make a precise chip area comparison of these three silicon compilers, real SLA and ULA circuits have been designed. Four typical AHPL descriptions of different circuits or varying complexity were chosen as comparison examples. The result shows that the SLA layout requires least area for circuit realization generally. The PPLA approach is the worst one for large scale circuit realization, while the ULA lies in between.
author2 Hill, Frederick J.
author_facet Hill, Frederick J.
CHEN, DUAN-PING.
author CHEN, DUAN-PING.
author_sort CHEN, DUAN-PING.
title VLSI REALIZATION OF AHPL DESCRIPTION AS SLA, PPLA, & ULA AND THEIR COMPARISONS (CAD).
title_short VLSI REALIZATION OF AHPL DESCRIPTION AS SLA, PPLA, & ULA AND THEIR COMPARISONS (CAD).
title_full VLSI REALIZATION OF AHPL DESCRIPTION AS SLA, PPLA, & ULA AND THEIR COMPARISONS (CAD).
title_fullStr VLSI REALIZATION OF AHPL DESCRIPTION AS SLA, PPLA, & ULA AND THEIR COMPARISONS (CAD).
title_full_unstemmed VLSI REALIZATION OF AHPL DESCRIPTION AS SLA, PPLA, & ULA AND THEIR COMPARISONS (CAD).
title_sort vlsi realization of ahpl description as sla, ppla, & ula and their comparisons (cad).
publisher The University of Arizona.
publishDate 1984
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187879
work_keys_str_mv AT chenduanping vlsirealizationofahpldescriptionasslapplaulaandtheircomparisonscad
_version_ 1718098286978531328