Food-associated response inhibition training to reduce snacking behaviour

Inhibition is a facet of executive control that can be an area of weakness, in particular in people who overeat. However, laboratory studies suggest that interventions that target disinhibited eating can strengthen response inhibition and ultimately reduce overeating. The current study investigated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: O'Sullivan, Jamie
Other Authors: Lawrence, Natalia; Verbruggen, Frederick
Published: University of Exeter 2014
Subjects:
150
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.621483
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-621483
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6214832017-03-16T15:41:48ZFood-associated response inhibition training to reduce snacking behaviourO'Sullivan, JamieLawrence, Natalia; Verbruggen, Frederick2014Inhibition is a facet of executive control that can be an area of weakness, in particular in people who overeat. However, laboratory studies suggest that interventions that target disinhibited eating can strengthen response inhibition and ultimately reduce overeating. The current study investigated whether response inhibition could be trained to help reduce food consumption. Eighty four adults who were self-reported disinhibited eaters and predominantly overweight or obese completed five response-inhibition training sessions in a two-week food training study. Participants were randomly allocated to a go/no-go task condition (control versus active) that mapped either non-food stimuli (control) or high-calorie foods (active) on to no-go signals. Participants’ weight, calorie intake, daily snacking and food evaluations were measured at baseline and post-intervention. Results indicate that participants in the active condition showed significant weight-loss post-intervention [F (1, 38) = 5.625, p < .023, ηp2 = .129] as well as a reduction in overall calorie intake [F (1, 39) = 7.951, p < .008, ηp2 = .169] compared with the control group [F (1, 38) = 0.142, p = .709]. However, there was no change over time [F (1, 79) = 2.280, p = .135] or group differences [F (1, 79) = .144, p = .706] in self-reported daily snacking frequency post–intervention. The active group showed a reduction in ratings of liking of unhealthy (no-go) foods from pre- to post-intervention [t (38) = -1.974, p = .056] compared with the control group [t (40) = 1.040, p = .305]. At one-month follow-up, both groups reported significant weight loss [F (1, 64) = 40.679, p < .001, ηp2 = .389] as well as a reduction in monthly snacking frequency [F (1, 69) = 14.018, p < .001, ηp2 = .169]. The results provide supporting evidence that training response inhibition may be an effective technique to help disinhibited eaters become more self-controlled and ultimately reduce their weight.150University of Exeterhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.621483http://hdl.handle.net/10871/15636Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 150
spellingShingle 150
O'Sullivan, Jamie
Food-associated response inhibition training to reduce snacking behaviour
description Inhibition is a facet of executive control that can be an area of weakness, in particular in people who overeat. However, laboratory studies suggest that interventions that target disinhibited eating can strengthen response inhibition and ultimately reduce overeating. The current study investigated whether response inhibition could be trained to help reduce food consumption. Eighty four adults who were self-reported disinhibited eaters and predominantly overweight or obese completed five response-inhibition training sessions in a two-week food training study. Participants were randomly allocated to a go/no-go task condition (control versus active) that mapped either non-food stimuli (control) or high-calorie foods (active) on to no-go signals. Participants’ weight, calorie intake, daily snacking and food evaluations were measured at baseline and post-intervention. Results indicate that participants in the active condition showed significant weight-loss post-intervention [F (1, 38) = 5.625, p < .023, ηp2 = .129] as well as a reduction in overall calorie intake [F (1, 39) = 7.951, p < .008, ηp2 = .169] compared with the control group [F (1, 38) = 0.142, p = .709]. However, there was no change over time [F (1, 79) = 2.280, p = .135] or group differences [F (1, 79) = .144, p = .706] in self-reported daily snacking frequency post–intervention. The active group showed a reduction in ratings of liking of unhealthy (no-go) foods from pre- to post-intervention [t (38) = -1.974, p = .056] compared with the control group [t (40) = 1.040, p = .305]. At one-month follow-up, both groups reported significant weight loss [F (1, 64) = 40.679, p < .001, ηp2 = .389] as well as a reduction in monthly snacking frequency [F (1, 69) = 14.018, p < .001, ηp2 = .169]. The results provide supporting evidence that training response inhibition may be an effective technique to help disinhibited eaters become more self-controlled and ultimately reduce their weight.
author2 Lawrence, Natalia; Verbruggen, Frederick
author_facet Lawrence, Natalia; Verbruggen, Frederick
O'Sullivan, Jamie
author O'Sullivan, Jamie
author_sort O'Sullivan, Jamie
title Food-associated response inhibition training to reduce snacking behaviour
title_short Food-associated response inhibition training to reduce snacking behaviour
title_full Food-associated response inhibition training to reduce snacking behaviour
title_fullStr Food-associated response inhibition training to reduce snacking behaviour
title_full_unstemmed Food-associated response inhibition training to reduce snacking behaviour
title_sort food-associated response inhibition training to reduce snacking behaviour
publisher University of Exeter
publishDate 2014
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.621483
work_keys_str_mv AT osullivanjamie foodassociatedresponseinhibitiontrainingtoreducesnackingbehaviour
_version_ 1718422197533409280