Avoiding the pitfall encountered by the Canadian courts when assessing the admissibility of unconstitutionally obtained evidence in criminal trials in South Africa - A proposed alternative framework
This article is presented in five parts. The first part consists of this introduction, which is followed by a discussion of the Canadian legal position in part two. The cases of R v Collins1 and R v Stillman,2 as well as the impact of these cases on the Canadian admissibility framework, will be expl...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
South African Journal List Law
2010
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://encore.tut.ac.za/iii/cpro/DigitalItemViewPage.external?sp=1001167 |