Individual differences in speech perception: sources, functions, and consequences of phoneme categorization gradiency

During spoken language comprehension, listeners transform continuous acoustic cues into categories (e.g. /b/ and /p/). While longstanding research suggests that phoneme categories are activated in a gradient way, there are also clear individual differences, with more gradient categorization being li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kapnoula, Efthymia Evangelia
Other Authors: McMurray, Bob
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: University of Iowa 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/3115
https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6457&context=etd
id ndltd-uiowa.edu-oai-ir.uiowa.edu-etd-6457
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-uiowa.edu-oai-ir.uiowa.edu-etd-64572019-10-13T04:38:15Z Individual differences in speech perception: sources, functions, and consequences of phoneme categorization gradiency Kapnoula, Efthymia Evangelia During spoken language comprehension, listeners transform continuous acoustic cues into categories (e.g. /b/ and /p/). While longstanding research suggests that phoneme categories are activated in a gradient way, there are also clear individual differences, with more gradient categorization being linked to various communication impairment like dyslexia and specific language impairments (Joanisse, Manis, Keating, & Seidenberg, 2000; López-Zamora, Luque, Álvarez, & Cobos, 2012; Serniclaes, Van Heghe, Mousty, Carré, & Sprenger-Charolles, 2004; Werker & Tees, 1987). Crucially, most studies have used two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) tasks to measure the sharpness of between-category boundaries. Here we propose an alternative paradigm that allows us to measure categorization gradiency in a more direct way. We then use this measure in an individual differences paradigm to: (a) examine the nature of categorization gradiency, (b) explore its links to different aspects of speech perception and other cognitive processes, (c) test different hypotheses about its sources, (d) evaluate its (positive/negative) role in spoken language comprehension, and (e) assess whether it can be modified via training. Our results provide validation for this new method of assessing phoneme categorization gradiency and offer valuable insights into the mechanisms that underlie speech perception. 2016-05-01T07:00:00Z dissertation application/pdf https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/3115 https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6457&context=etd Copyright 2016 Efthymia Evangelia Kapnoula Theses and Dissertations eng University of IowaMcMurray, Bob publicabstract categorical perception cue encoding individual differences phoneme categorization speech perception visual analogue scaling Psychology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic publicabstract
categorical perception
cue encoding
individual differences
phoneme categorization
speech perception
visual analogue scaling
Psychology
spellingShingle publicabstract
categorical perception
cue encoding
individual differences
phoneme categorization
speech perception
visual analogue scaling
Psychology
Kapnoula, Efthymia Evangelia
Individual differences in speech perception: sources, functions, and consequences of phoneme categorization gradiency
description During spoken language comprehension, listeners transform continuous acoustic cues into categories (e.g. /b/ and /p/). While longstanding research suggests that phoneme categories are activated in a gradient way, there are also clear individual differences, with more gradient categorization being linked to various communication impairment like dyslexia and specific language impairments (Joanisse, Manis, Keating, & Seidenberg, 2000; López-Zamora, Luque, Álvarez, & Cobos, 2012; Serniclaes, Van Heghe, Mousty, Carré, & Sprenger-Charolles, 2004; Werker & Tees, 1987). Crucially, most studies have used two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) tasks to measure the sharpness of between-category boundaries. Here we propose an alternative paradigm that allows us to measure categorization gradiency in a more direct way. We then use this measure in an individual differences paradigm to: (a) examine the nature of categorization gradiency, (b) explore its links to different aspects of speech perception and other cognitive processes, (c) test different hypotheses about its sources, (d) evaluate its (positive/negative) role in spoken language comprehension, and (e) assess whether it can be modified via training. Our results provide validation for this new method of assessing phoneme categorization gradiency and offer valuable insights into the mechanisms that underlie speech perception.
author2 McMurray, Bob
author_facet McMurray, Bob
Kapnoula, Efthymia Evangelia
author Kapnoula, Efthymia Evangelia
author_sort Kapnoula, Efthymia Evangelia
title Individual differences in speech perception: sources, functions, and consequences of phoneme categorization gradiency
title_short Individual differences in speech perception: sources, functions, and consequences of phoneme categorization gradiency
title_full Individual differences in speech perception: sources, functions, and consequences of phoneme categorization gradiency
title_fullStr Individual differences in speech perception: sources, functions, and consequences of phoneme categorization gradiency
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in speech perception: sources, functions, and consequences of phoneme categorization gradiency
title_sort individual differences in speech perception: sources, functions, and consequences of phoneme categorization gradiency
publisher University of Iowa
publishDate 2016
url https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/3115
https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6457&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT kapnoulaefthymiaevangelia individualdifferencesinspeechperceptionsourcesfunctionsandconsequencesofphonemecategorizationgradiency
_version_ 1719264612429332480