Positivist and pluralist trends in Canadian Aboriginal Law: the judicial imagination and performance of sovereignty in Indigenous-state relations

This dissertation identifies institutional positivism and historically grounded pluralism as interpretive trends in the Canadian case law on Indigenous-state relations, and explores tensions between these trends. These are tensions between practices of judicial interpretation, not between theories o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beaton, Ryan
Other Authors: Borrows, John
Format: Others
Language:English
en
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1828/13391
Beaton, Ryan, Articles 27 and 46(2): UNDRIP Signposts Pointing Beyond the Justifiable-Infringement Morass of Section 35 (2018). UNDRIP Implementation: More Reflections on the Braiding of International, Domestic and Indigenous Laws (Centre for International Governance Innovation 2018), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3396121
Beaton, R. (2018). De facto and de jure crown sovereignty: Reconciliation and legitimation at the supreme court of canada. Constitutional Forum / Forum Constitutionnel, 26(4), 25. https://doi.org/10.21991/cf29360
Beaton, R. (2019). Legal Pluralism and Caron v Alberta: A Canadian Case Study in Constitutional Interpretation. Review of Constitutional Studies, 24(1), 123-154. https://www.constitutionalstudies.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/05_Beaton-5.pdf