Comparison of traveling-subject and ComBat harmonization methods for assessing structural brain characteristics

Comparison of traveling-subject and ComBat harmonization methods for assessing structural brain characteristics

Multisite magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in clinical research and development. Measurement biases—caused by site differences in scanner/image-acquisition protocols—negatively influence the reliability and reproducibility of image-analysis methods. Harmonization can reduce bias...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kasai, K. (Author), Koike, S. (Author), Maikusa, N. (Author), Okada, N. (Author), Okanoya, K. (Author), Saotome, K. (Author), Tanaka, S.C (Author), Uematsu, A. (Author), Yamashita, A. (Author), Yamashita, O. (Author), Zhu, Y. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: John Wiley and Sons Inc 2021
Subjects:
adult
Adult
anatomy and histology
Article
brain
Brain
clinical trial
ComBat
comparative study
controlled study
devices
diagnostic imaging
FreeSurfer
harmonization
human
Humans
image processing
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
major clinical study
MRI
Multicenter Studies as Topic
multicenter study
multicenter study (topic)
multisite
neuroimaging
Neuroimaging
nuclear magnetic resonance imaging
procedures
reproducibility
statistical analysis
statistical bias
traveling subject
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher

Internet

View Fulltext in Publisher

Similar Items