Taxing food consumption to reduce environmental impacts – Identification of synergies and goal conflicts

This study analysed the environmental impacts of taxation on Swedish food consumption and sought to identify potential synergies and goal conflicts between environmental aspects. This was done by analysing various taxation scenarios to reduce environmental impacts of food, including taxation based o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hansson, P.-A (Author), Moberg, E. (Author), Röös, E. (Author), Säll, S. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02326nam a2200313Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.foodpol.2021.102090
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 03069192 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Taxing food consumption to reduce environmental impacts – Identification of synergies and goal conflicts 
260 0 |b Elsevier Ltd  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102090 
520 3 |a This study analysed the environmental impacts of taxation on Swedish food consumption and sought to identify potential synergies and goal conflicts between environmental aspects. This was done by analysing various taxation scenarios to reduce environmental impacts of food, including taxation based on: climate impact; a score based on weighting of several environmental impacts; and adjusted rates of value-added tax (VAT). A net decrease in food consumption was seen for most taxation scenarios, resulting in reduced burdens for climate change and most other environmental categories. An exception was found for a scenario simulating reduced VAT rates for plant-based products, where a net increase of food consumption was seen, resulting in an increased burden for all environmental categories. Many of the scenarios resulted in a decrease in beef consumption, and hence a decline in pasture use. This is positive from a global perspective by limiting expansion of agricultural land, but on regional level in Sweden it could cause a goal conflict with maintaining biodiversity-rich semi-natural pastures. To avoid this, beef production on semi-natural pastures could be further incentivised by production-side measures. With regard to biodiversity loss, the overall burden could increase if taxation leads to an increase in products from biodiverse regions. © 2021 The Author(s) 
650 0 4 |a Climate tax 
650 0 4 |a environmental impact 
650 0 4 |a Environmental impacts 
650 0 4 |a Food 
650 0 4 |a food consumption 
650 0 4 |a food market 
650 0 4 |a food policy 
650 0 4 |a Goal conflicts 
650 0 4 |a Sweden 
650 0 4 |a Synergies 
650 0 4 |a tax system 
650 0 4 |a Value-added tax 
700 1 |a Hansson, P.-A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Moberg, E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Röös, E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Säll, S.  |e author 
773 |t Food Policy