Part 2: Is the maxillary canting and its surgical correction in patients with CFM correlated to the mandibular deformity?

Part 2: Is the maxillary canting and its surgical correction in patients with CFM correlated to the mandibular deformity?

Introduction: Patients with Craniofacial Microsomia (CFM) mandibles Types I/IIa benefit from combined LeFort 1 osteotomy and Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis (LeFort + MDO); Type IIb from LeFort + MDO or Bimaxillary osteotomy (BiMax); and Type III from BiMax (with 50% of cases having preceding ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caron, C.J.J.M (Author), Dunaway, D.J (Author), Koudstaal, M.J (Author), Padwa, B.L (Author), Pluijmers, B.I (Author), van de Lande, L.S (Author), Wolvius, E.B (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Churchill Livingstone 2018
Subjects:
adolescent
Adolescent
adult
Article
bone graft
child
Child
cone beam computed tomography
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
controlled study
craniofacial malformation
craniofacial microsomia
dental procedure
diagnostic imaging
disease severity
distraction osteogenesis
Esthetics, Dental
face asymmetry
Facial Asymmetry
female
Female
genioplasty
Goldenhar syndrome
Goldenhar Syndrome
human
Humans
Le Fort I osteotomy
Le Fort osteotomy
major clinical study
male
Male
mandible hypoplasia
mandible reconstruction
Mandibular distraction osteogenesis
Mandibular Reconstruction
maxilla hypoplasia
maxillofacial development
Maxillofacial Development
Oculo-auriculo-vertebral syndrome
OMENS
Osteogenesis, Distraction
Osteotomy, Le Fort
procedures
Retrospective Studies
retrospective study
school child
young adult
Young Adult
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher

Internet

View Fulltext in Publisher

Similar Items