Canonical babbling ratio – Concurrent and predictive evaluation of the 0.15 criterion

• Main Authors: Lohmander, A. (Author), Nyman, A. (Author), Strömbergsson, S. (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc. 2021
• Subjects: Article; canonical babbling; CBR; child; Child; Child Language; child parent relation; cleft palate; consonant; hearing impairment; human; Humans; infant; Infant; Infant vocalizations; language; Language; language ability; language delay; language development; language disability; longitudinal study; Observation method; outcome assessment; outcome variable; Percentage of consonants correct; prediction; receiver operating characteristic; sensitivity and specificity; speech; Speech; speech and language; speech disorder; Speech Disorders; Validity; vocabulary; Vocabulary; vocalization
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Introduction: Canonical babbling ratio (CBR) is a commonly used measure to quantify canonical babbling (CB), and 0.15 is the commonly accepted criterion for the canonical babbling stage. However, this has not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of this criterion using concurrent and predictive comparisons. Methods: Longitudinal data from 50 children recruited in different clinical projects were used. At 10 months of age, CBR was calculated based on counted utterances from audio-video recorded parent-child interactions. The videos were also assessed by CB observation, where an observer made an overall judgement on whether the child was in the canonical babbling stage or not. For the concurrent evaluation, CBR was compared to CB observation as a reference test, using area under the curve (AUC). The criterion resulting in the best combination of sensitivity and specificity was identified using positive likelihood ratios. In the predictive comparisons CBR was analyzed as a predictor of speech/language difficulties at 30–36 months. Participants presenting with difficulties in consonant production and/or parent-reported vocabulary were considered to have speech/language difficulties. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for CBR using the 0.15 criterion and the new criterion identified in this study. Results: An AUC of 0.87 indicated that CBR is a valid measure of canonical babbling in 10-month-old children. The best combination of sensitivity and specificity was found at a criterion of 0.14 (sensitivity 0.96, specificity 0.70). In the predictive comparison, CBR with a 0.14 or 0.15 criterion revealed the same sensitivity (0.71) but 0.14 showed a slightly better specificity (0.52 versus 0.42). Conclusions: CBR is a valid measure of CB (at 10 months). However, when using CBR to classify children's babbling as canonical or non-canonical, researchers need to carefully consider the implications of the chosen criterion. © 2021