Auditory and visual naming tests for children

Assessment of naming in children has been hampered by the use of tests that were developed, either to assess naming in adults or to assess related verbal functions in children. We developed comparable visual naming test (VNT) and auditory description naming (ANT) specifically for children. We collec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamberger, M.J (Author), MacAllister, W.S (Author), Seidel, W.T (Author), Smith, M.L (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Routledge 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03474nam a2200649Ia 4500
001 10.1080-09297049.2017.1414172
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 09297049 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Auditory and visual naming tests for children 
260 0 |b Routledge  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2017.1414172 
520 3 |a Assessment of naming in children has been hampered by the use of tests that were developed, either to assess naming in adults or to assess related verbal functions in children. We developed comparable visual naming test (VNT) and auditory description naming (ANT) specifically for children. We collected normative data, not only for accuracy, typically the sole performance measure, but also for response time (RT) and reliance on phonemic cuing. The normative sample consisted of 200 typically developing children, ages 6–15, with 40 children per 2-year age group (6–7, 8–9, 10–11, 12–13, and 14–15). Children were tested individually by a trained examiner. Based on item analysis, naming tests were finalized at 36 items for ages 8–15 and 28 items for ages 6–7. Age-stratified normative data are provided for accuracy, mean RT, tip-of-the-tongues (i.e., delayed but accurate responses plus items named following phonemic cueing), and a summary score, which incorporates all performance measures. Internal and test–retest reliability coefficients for both tests were reasonable. Accuracy scores were high across age groups, indicating that item names were within the mental lexicon of most typically developing children. By contrast, time and cue-based scores improved with age, reflecting greater efficiency in word retrieval with development. These complementary auditory naming and visual naming tests for children address a longstanding clinical need, improving upon the current standard with respect to the sensitivity of performance measures and the addition of an auditory verbal component to the assessment of naming in children. © 2017, © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 
650 0 4 |a Acoustic Stimulation 
650 0 4 |a adolescent 
650 0 4 |a Adolescent 
650 0 4 |a association 
650 0 4 |a auditory naming 
650 0 4 |a auditory stimulation 
650 0 4 |a child 
650 0 4 |a Child 
650 0 4 |a child development 
650 0 4 |a Child Development 
650 0 4 |a Child language 
650 0 4 |a Cues 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a groups by age 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a human tissue 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a information retrieval 
650 0 4 |a language development 
650 0 4 |a major clinical study 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a naming assessment 
650 0 4 |a nomenclature 
650 0 4 |a Photic Stimulation 
650 0 4 |a photostimulation 
650 0 4 |a physiology 
650 0 4 |a procedures 
650 0 4 |a psychomotor performance 
650 0 4 |a Psychomotor Performance 
650 0 4 |a reaction time 
650 0 4 |a Reaction Time 
650 0 4 |a reliability 
650 0 4 |a reproducibility 
650 0 4 |a Reproducibility of Results 
650 0 4 |a response time 
650 0 4 |a tongue 
650 0 4 |a visual naming 
650 0 4 |a word production 
700 1 |a Hamberger, M.J.  |e author 
700 1 |a MacAllister, W.S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Seidel, W.T.  |e author 
700 1 |a Smith, M.L.  |e author 
773 |t Child Neuropsychology