Embedded Performance Validity Tests in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised: A Replication Study

• Main Authors: Bailey, K.C (Author), Bain, K.M (Author), Fullen, C. (Author), Soble, J.R (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: NLM (Medline) 2018
• Subjects: adult; Adult; aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; cognitive defect; Cognitive Dysfunction; female; Female; human; Humans; male; Male; memory; Memory; middle aged; Middle Aged; neuropsychological test; Neuropsychological Tests; physiology; psychology; sensitivity and specificity; Sensitivity and Specificity; verbal learning; Verbal Learning; very elderly; young adult; Young Adult
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Objective: Embedded performance validity tests (PVTs) within the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) were recently identified. This study aimed to further validate/replicate these embedded PVTs. Method: Eighty clinically referred veterans who underwent neuropsychological evaluation were included. Validity groups were established by passing/failing 2-3 well-validated PVTs, with 75% (n = 60) classified as valid and 25% (n = 20) noncredible. Fifty-two percent of valid participants were cognitively impaired. Results: HVLT-R Recognition Discrimination (RD) of ≤5 yielded 67% sensitivity/80% specificity for identifying noncredible performance. Removal of seven valid participants with an amnestic profile who produced a false positive, improved specificity to 92%, which replicated the original findings. Replication efforts failed for BVMT-R Percent Retained; however, significant findings for RD were elucidated. Conclusion: Replication efforts were positive for the HVLT-R embedded PVT, corroborating its ability to identify invalid performance in this heterogeneous clinical veteran sample with and without cognitive impairment.