GSA: an independent development algorithm for calling copy number and detecting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) from target capture sequencing

Background: The gain or loss of large chromosomal regions or even whole chromosomes is termed as genomic scarring and can be observed as copy number variations resulting from the failure of DNA damage repair. Results: In this study, a new algorithm called genomic scar analysis (GSA) has developed an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cai, Y. (Author), Chen, D. (Author), Li, Q. (Author), Meng, P. (Author), Shao, M. (Author), Shi, T. (Author), Song, C. (Author), Wang, C. (Author), Wang, X. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03502nam a2200589Ia 4500
001 10.1186-s12859-021-04487-9
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 14712105 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a GSA: an independent development algorithm for calling copy number and detecting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) from target capture sequencing 
260 0 |b BioMed Central Ltd  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04487-9 
520 3 |a Background: The gain or loss of large chromosomal regions or even whole chromosomes is termed as genomic scarring and can be observed as copy number variations resulting from the failure of DNA damage repair. Results: In this study, a new algorithm called genomic scar analysis (GSA) has developed and validated to calculate homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score. The two critical submodules were tree recursion (TR) segmentation and filtering, and the estimation and correction of the tumor purity and ploidy. Then, this study evaluated the rationality of segmentation and genotype identification by the GSA algorithm and compared with other two algorithms, PureCN and ASCAT, found that the segmentation result of GSA algorithm was more logical. In addition, the results indicated that the GSA algorithm had an excellent predictive effect on tumor purity and ploidy, if the tumor purity was more than 20%. Furtherly, this study evaluated the HRD scores and BRCA1/2 deficiency status of 195 clinical samples, and the results indicated that the accuracy was 0.98 (comparing with Affymetrix OncoScan™ assay) and the sensitivity was 95.2% (comparing with BRCA1/2 deficiency status), both were well-behaved. Finally, HRD scores and 16 genes mutations (TP53 and 15 HRR pathway genes) were analyzed in 17 cell lines, the results showed that there was higher frequency in HRR pathway genes in high HRD score samples. Conclusions: This new algorithm, named as GSA, could effectively and accurately calculate the purity and ploidy of tumor samples through NGS data, and then reflect the degree of genomic instability and large-scale copy number variations of tumor samples. © 2021, The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a algorithm 
650 0 4 |a Algorithms 
650 0 4 |a Analysis algorithms 
650 0 4 |a Cell culture 
650 0 4 |a Cicatrix 
650 0 4 |a copy number variation 
650 0 4 |a Copy number variations 
650 0 4 |a Copy number variations 
650 0 4 |a DNA Copy Number Variations 
650 0 4 |a Genes 
650 0 4 |a Genomic scar analyse 
650 0 4 |a Genomic scar analysis 
650 0 4 |a genomics 
650 0 4 |a Genomics 
650 0 4 |a Genomics 
650 0 4 |a homologous recombination 
650 0 4 |a Homologous recombination 
650 0 4 |a Homologous Recombination 
650 0 4 |a Homologous recombination deficiency 
650 0 4 |a Homologous recombination deficiency 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Pathway genes 
650 0 4 |a scar 
650 0 4 |a Segmentation 
650 0 4 |a Segmentation 
650 0 4 |a Tumor purity and ploidy correction 
650 0 4 |a Tumor purity and ploidy correction 
650 0 4 |a Tumor samples 
650 0 4 |a Tumors 
700 1 |a Cai, Y.  |e author 
700 1 |a Chen, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Li, Q.  |e author 
700 1 |a Meng, P.  |e author 
700 1 |a Shao, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Shi, T.  |e author 
700 1 |a Song, C.  |e author 
700 1 |a Wang, C.  |e author 
700 1 |a Wang, X.  |e author 
773 |t BMC Bioinformatics