Flow-Induced Force Modeling and Active Compensation for a Fluid-Tethered Multirotor Aerial Craft during Pressurised Jetting

This paper presents an investigation of the fluid–structure interaction (FSI) effects on the stability of a quadrotor attached to a flexible hose conveying and ejecting pressurised fluid from an onboard nozzle. In this study, an analytical solution is derived to obtain the time and spatial responses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Foong, S. (Author), Lee, S.M (Author), Liu, J. (Author), Ng, W.H (Author), Srigrarom, S. (Author), Wong, S.K (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02232nam a2200253Ia 4500
001 10.3390-drones6040088
008 220425s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 2504446X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Flow-Induced Force Modeling and Active Compensation for a Fluid-Tethered Multirotor Aerial Craft during Pressurised Jetting 
260 0 |b MDPI  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6040088 
520 3 |a This paper presents an investigation of the fluid–structure interaction (FSI) effects on the stability of a quadrotor attached to a flexible hose conveying and ejecting pressurised fluid from an onboard nozzle. In this study, an analytical solution is derived to obtain the time and spatial responses of the free end, which could affect the quadrotor’s stability. First, the flow-induced force model was simulated at the hose plane to find out the contributing disturbances prior to the physical connection with the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Thereafter, the flow-induced forces were introduced to the UAV dynamics model as disturbances to study the FSI response during flight. Physical experiments were conducted to compare the analytical responses of the UAV prior to and during ejection. The presented findings of the perturbations due to the FSI effect from the pressurised fluid flowing through the flexible hose to the free end and the jet reaction at the UAV nozzle will be used for the employment of a combined feedforward-feedback (FF-FB) quadrotor control strategy for a stable ejection phase. The proposed strategy shows an average improvement of 61.14% (x-axis) and 22.46% (z-axis) in terms of active position compensation during ejection as compared to a standard feedback (FB) control loop only. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a active position compensation 
650 0 4 |a combined feedforward-feedback control 
650 0 4 |a flow-induced forces 
650 0 4 |a fluid-ejecting UAV 
650 0 4 |a fluid–structure interaction 
700 1 |a Foong, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Lee, S.M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Liu, J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Ng, W.H.  |e author 
700 1 |a Srigrarom, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Wong, S.K.  |e author 
773 |t Drones