Evaluation of the efficacy of ChAd63-MVA vectored vaccines expressing CS & ME-TRAP against controlled human malaria infection in malaria naïve individuals
Background.?Circumsporozoite protein (CS) is the antigenic target for RTS,S, the most advanced malaria vaccine to date. Heterologous prime-boost with the viral vectors ChAd63-MVA is the most potent inducer of T-cells in humans, demonstrating significant efficacy when expressing the pre-erythrocytic...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2015-04-01.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get fulltext |
Summary: | Background.?Circumsporozoite protein (CS) is the antigenic target for RTS,S, the most advanced malaria vaccine to date. Heterologous prime-boost with the viral vectors ChAd63-MVA is the most potent inducer of T-cells in humans, demonstrating significant efficacy when expressing the pre-erythrocytic antigen insert ME-TRAP. We hypothesised that ChAd63-MVA containing CS may result in significant, clinical protective efficacy. Methods.?We conducted an open-label, two-site partially randomized sporozoite controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) study to compare the clinical efficacy of ChAd63-MVA CS with ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP. The study was registered at: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01623557). Results.?1/15 (7%) vaccinees receiving ChAd63-MVA CS and 2/15 (13%) vaccinees receiving ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP were sterilely protected post-CHMI. 3/15 (20%) vaccinees receiving ChAd63-MVA CS and 5/15 (33%) vaccinees receiving ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP demonstrated a delay in time to treatment compared to unvaccinated controls. In qPCR analyses, ChAd63-MVA CS was estimated to reduce liver parasite burden by 69-79%, compared to 79-84% for ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP. Conclusions.?ChAd63-MVA CS does result in a reduction in liver parasite burden but ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP remains the most promising antigenic insert for a vectored liver-stage vaccine. Detailed analyses of parasite kinetics may allow detection of smaller, but biologically important differences in vaccine efficacy that can influence future vaccine development |
---|