Clinical trials optimizing investigator and self‐collection of buccal cells for RNA yield

Abstract Objective Buccal cells are an ideal surrogate tissue for studying biologic effects of carcinogens or drugs, however inherent fragility and salivary RNAses limit RNA yield. We conducted healthy volunteer trials to optimize collection conditions. Methods We conducted: (a) a single‐arm crossov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessica L. Geiger, Elizabeth D. Cedars, Yan Zang, Daniel P. Normolle, Hua Li, Jennifer R. Grandis, Sara Centuori, Daniel E. Johnson, Julie E. Bauman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-02-01
Series:Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.516
id doaj-18cd0ea96d0143c78ff8b8479ee88aa9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18cd0ea96d0143c78ff8b8479ee88aa92021-02-15T12:54:20ZengWileyLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology2378-80382021-02-016111612110.1002/lio2.516Clinical trials optimizing investigator and self‐collection of buccal cells for RNA yieldJessica L. Geiger0Elizabeth D. Cedars1Yan Zang2Daniel P. Normolle3Hua Li4Jennifer R. Grandis5Sara Centuori6Daniel E. Johnson7Julie E. Bauman8Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USADepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco San Francisco California USADepartment of Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USADepartment of Biostatistics University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USADepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco San Francisco California USADepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco San Francisco California USADepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson Arizona USADepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco San Francisco California USADepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson Arizona USAAbstract Objective Buccal cells are an ideal surrogate tissue for studying biologic effects of carcinogens or drugs, however inherent fragility and salivary RNAses limit RNA yield. We conducted healthy volunteer trials to optimize collection conditions. Methods We conducted: (a) a single‐arm crossover study evaluating four test conditions on RNA yield by buccal cytobrush; (b) a single‐arm prospective study evaluating RNA yield by investigator vs self‐collection. Results Antecedent toothbrushing, time of day, and number of cytobrush strokes did not significantly impact RNA yield. RNA yield was doubled by using 2 vs 1 cytobrush per buccal surface (P = .0054). Self‐collection of buccal cells for RNA was feasible; 36 of 50 (72%) samples passed quality control. Conclusion RNA yield was doubled by using two cytobrushes per buccal surface. Healthy volunteers can self‐collect sufficient buccal RNA for gene expression studies. Techniques from these pragmatic trials could enhance availability of a limited tissue for serial biomarker measurements. Level of Evidence 1b—Prognosis Study (Individual prospective cohort study).https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.516biomarkerbuccal cellcytobrushevidence‐based medicinemolecular biologyoral cavity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jessica L. Geiger
Elizabeth D. Cedars
Yan Zang
Daniel P. Normolle
Hua Li
Jennifer R. Grandis
Sara Centuori
Daniel E. Johnson
Julie E. Bauman
spellingShingle Jessica L. Geiger
Elizabeth D. Cedars
Yan Zang
Daniel P. Normolle
Hua Li
Jennifer R. Grandis
Sara Centuori
Daniel E. Johnson
Julie E. Bauman
Clinical trials optimizing investigator and self‐collection of buccal cells for RNA yield
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
biomarker
buccal cell
cytobrush
evidence‐based medicine
molecular biology
oral cavity
author_facet Jessica L. Geiger
Elizabeth D. Cedars
Yan Zang
Daniel P. Normolle
Hua Li
Jennifer R. Grandis
Sara Centuori
Daniel E. Johnson
Julie E. Bauman
author_sort Jessica L. Geiger
title Clinical trials optimizing investigator and self‐collection of buccal cells for RNA yield
title_short Clinical trials optimizing investigator and self‐collection of buccal cells for RNA yield
title_full Clinical trials optimizing investigator and self‐collection of buccal cells for RNA yield
title_fullStr Clinical trials optimizing investigator and self‐collection of buccal cells for RNA yield
title_full_unstemmed Clinical trials optimizing investigator and self‐collection of buccal cells for RNA yield
title_sort clinical trials optimizing investigator and self‐collection of buccal cells for rna yield
publisher Wiley
series Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
issn 2378-8038
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Objective Buccal cells are an ideal surrogate tissue for studying biologic effects of carcinogens or drugs, however inherent fragility and salivary RNAses limit RNA yield. We conducted healthy volunteer trials to optimize collection conditions. Methods We conducted: (a) a single‐arm crossover study evaluating four test conditions on RNA yield by buccal cytobrush; (b) a single‐arm prospective study evaluating RNA yield by investigator vs self‐collection. Results Antecedent toothbrushing, time of day, and number of cytobrush strokes did not significantly impact RNA yield. RNA yield was doubled by using 2 vs 1 cytobrush per buccal surface (P = .0054). Self‐collection of buccal cells for RNA was feasible; 36 of 50 (72%) samples passed quality control. Conclusion RNA yield was doubled by using two cytobrushes per buccal surface. Healthy volunteers can self‐collect sufficient buccal RNA for gene expression studies. Techniques from these pragmatic trials could enhance availability of a limited tissue for serial biomarker measurements. Level of Evidence 1b—Prognosis Study (Individual prospective cohort study).
topic biomarker
buccal cell
cytobrush
evidence‐based medicine
molecular biology
oral cavity
url https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.516
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicalgeiger clinicaltrialsoptimizinginvestigatorandselfcollectionofbuccalcellsforrnayield
AT elizabethdcedars clinicaltrialsoptimizinginvestigatorandselfcollectionofbuccalcellsforrnayield
AT yanzang clinicaltrialsoptimizinginvestigatorandselfcollectionofbuccalcellsforrnayield
AT danielpnormolle clinicaltrialsoptimizinginvestigatorandselfcollectionofbuccalcellsforrnayield
AT huali clinicaltrialsoptimizinginvestigatorandselfcollectionofbuccalcellsforrnayield
AT jenniferrgrandis clinicaltrialsoptimizinginvestigatorandselfcollectionofbuccalcellsforrnayield
AT saracentuori clinicaltrialsoptimizinginvestigatorandselfcollectionofbuccalcellsforrnayield
AT danielejohnson clinicaltrialsoptimizinginvestigatorandselfcollectionofbuccalcellsforrnayield
AT julieebauman clinicaltrialsoptimizinginvestigatorandselfcollectionofbuccalcellsforrnayield
_version_ 1724268925379674112