In vivo and in vitro mutagenicity of perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde

Background: Perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde are natural substances found in plants that are used as flavoring ingredients. Due to the α,β-unsaturated aldehydes in their structures, these compounds are expected to be DNA reactive. Indeed, several reports have indicated that perillaldehyde and cinna...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Honma, M. (Author), Horibata, K. (Author), Masumura, K. (Author), Sugiyama, K.-I (Author), Yamada, M. (Author), Yasui, M. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02870nam a2200517Ia 4500
001 10.1186-s41021-021-00204-3
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 18807046 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a In vivo and in vitro mutagenicity of perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde 
260 0 |b BioMed Central Ltd  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-021-00204-3 
520 3 |a Background: Perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde are natural substances found in plants that are used as flavoring ingredients. Due to the α,β-unsaturated aldehydes in their structures, these compounds are expected to be DNA reactive. Indeed, several reports have indicated that perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde show positive in in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests. However, their genotoxic potentials are currently disputed. To clarify the mutagenicity of perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde, we conducted in silico quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) analysis, in vitro Ames tests, and in vivo transgenic rodent gene mutation (TGR) assays. Results: In Ames tests, perillaldehyde was negative and cinnamaldehyde was positive; these respective results were supported by QSAR analysis. In TGR assays, we treated Muta™ Mice with perillaldehyde and gpt-delta mice with cinnamaldehyde up to the maximum tested doses (1000 mg/kg/day). There was no increase in gene mutations in the liver, glandular stomach, or small intestine following all treatments except the positive control (N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea at 100 mg/kg/day). Conclusions: These data clearly show no evidence of in vivo mutagenic potentials of perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde (administered up to 1000 mg/kg/day) in mice; however, cinnamaldehyde is mutagenic in vitro. © 2021, The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a Ames test 
650 0 4 |a Ames test 
650 0 4 |a animal experiment 
650 0 4 |a animal tissue 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a cinnamaldehyde 
650 0 4 |a Cinnamaldehyde 
650 0 4 |a controlled study 
650 0 4 |a ethylnitrosourea 
650 0 4 |a gene mutation 
650 0 4 |a gpt delta mouse 
650 0 4 |a in vitro study 
650 0 4 |a in vivo study 
650 0 4 |a liver 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a mouse 
650 0 4 |a mutagenicity 
650 0 4 |a Mutagenicity 
650 0 4 |a nonhuman 
650 0 4 |a perillaldehyde 
650 0 4 |a Perillaldehyde 
650 0 4 |a quantitative structure activity relation 
650 0 4 |a Quantitative structure–activity relationship 
650 0 4 |a small intestine 
650 0 4 |a stomach 
650 0 4 |a stomach gland 
650 0 4 |a Transgenic rodent gene mutation assay 
700 1 |a Honma, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Horibata, K.  |e author 
700 1 |a Masumura, K.  |e author 
700 1 |a Sugiyama, K.-I.  |e author 
700 1 |a Yamada, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Yasui, M.  |e author 
773 |t Genes and Environment