Safety assessment of two new Lactobacillus strains as probiotic for human using a rat model

Two previously isolated Lactobacillus strains (L. fermentum HM3 from human milk and L. buchneri FD2 from fermented dates), intended as probiotic for human, were assessed for their safety using acute and subacute oral toxicity tests in rats. In addition, their effects on cecal microflora and harmful...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faseleh Jahromi, M. (Author), Ho, Y.W (Author), Kalavathy, R. (Author), Liang, J.B (Author), Shokryazdan, P. (Author), Sieo, C.C (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2016
Subjects:
rat
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
View in Scopus
LEADER 03879nam a2200901Ia 4500
001 10.1371-journal.pone.0159851
008 220120s2016 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 19326203 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Safety assessment of two new Lactobacillus strains as probiotic for human using a rat model 
260 0 |b Public Library of Science  |c 2016 
520 3 |a Two previously isolated Lactobacillus strains (L. fermentum HM3 from human milk and L. buchneri FD2 from fermented dates), intended as probiotic for human, were assessed for their safety using acute and subacute oral toxicity tests in rats. In addition, their effects on cecal microflora and harmful bacterial enzymes (β-glucuronidase and β-glucosidase) of the tested animals were also determined. The results showed that L. buchneri FD2, L. fermentum HM3, or a mixture of them were safe up to a level of 1010 CFU/kg BW/day in a 14-day or 28-day treatment period. Both strains were well tolerated and there were no observed adverse effects on growth, feed consumption, cellular blood components and vital organs of the treated animals. The Lactobacillus strains were also able to reduce harmful intestinal bacterial enzymes, and decrease pathogenic bacterial populations while increasing beneficial bacterial populations. These results suggest that the two Lactobacillus strains are safe and could be potential probiotic for human. © 2016 Shokryazdan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 
650 0 4 |a acute toxicity 
650 0 4 |a animal 
650 0 4 |a animal experiment 
650 0 4 |a animal model 
650 0 4 |a animal tissue 
650 0 4 |a Animals 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a bacterial enzyme 
650 0 4 |a bacterial growth 
650 0 4 |a bacterial strain 
650 0 4 |a bacterium identification 
650 0 4 |a beta glucosidase 
650 0 4 |a beta glucuronidase 
650 0 4 |a biochemistry 
650 0 4 |a blood analysis 
650 0 4 |a blood component 
650 0 4 |a body weight 
650 0 4 |a Body Weight 
650 0 4 |a cecum 
650 0 4 |a Cecum 
650 0 4 |a controlled study 
650 0 4 |a drug effect 
650 0 4 |a enzyme activity 
650 0 4 |a enzyme assay 
650 0 4 |a enzymology 
650 0 4 |a feeding behavior 
650 0 4 |a Feeding Behavior 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a food intake 
650 0 4 |a growth rate 
650 0 4 |a histopathology 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a intestine flora 
650 0 4 |a Lactobacillus 
650 0 4 |a Lactobacillus buchneri 
650 0 4 |a Lactobacillus fermentum 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a microbiology 
650 0 4 |a Models, Animal 
650 0 4 |a molecular dynamics 
650 0 4 |a nonhuman 
650 0 4 |a oral toxicity 
650 0 4 |a organ weight 
650 0 4 |a probiotic agent 
650 0 4 |a Probiotics 
650 0 4 |a rat 
650 0 4 |a Rats 
650 0 4 |a Rats, Sprague-Dawley 
650 0 4 |a risk assessment 
650 0 4 |a species difference 
650 0 4 |a Species Specificity 
650 0 4 |a Sprague Dawley rat 
650 0 4 |a toxicity 
650 0 4 |a toxicity testing 
650 0 4 |a Toxicity Tests 
700 1 0 |a Faseleh Jahromi, M.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ho, Y.W.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kalavathy, R.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Liang, J.B.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shokryazdan, P.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sieo, C.C.  |e author 
773 |t PLoS ONE  |x 19326203 (ISSN)  |g 11 7 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159851 
856 |z View in Scopus  |u https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84982720883&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0159851&partnerID=40&md5=f0cf8329d32b1c8a6593fdcdac41f401